- 注册时间
- 2022-1-17
- 最后登录
- 2024-6-28
- 阅读权限
- 255
- 积分
- 4446
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1572
|
本帖最后由 普通人1 于 2022-2-13 11:19 编辑
远航一号 发表于 2022-2-13 02:12
美国疾控中心、福奇都是民主党的党棍,在美国人民心目中早已失去信誉(新冠病毒是可能引起呼吸衰竭,但是 ...
说话要严谨,这个我举双手赞成。但是像“美国疾控中心、福奇都是民主党的党棍,在美国人民心目中早已失去信誉”这种个人主观性这么强的话,也能拿来当论据吗?
我们来看看你贴的文章吧,链接不再放一遍了,看看文章说的什么。
The CDC data states that (emphasis added), “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”
Some people have expressed confusion over this statement following the president’s tweet, believing that only 6% of deaths attributed to COVID-19 were actually caused by the virus. This confusion has led to some reaching the conclusion that COVID-19 is far less dangerous than originally thought. However, the statistics actually show that of those who died due to COVID-19, the virus was the only cause of death 6% of the time. The other 94% of people who died from COVID-19 in the United States had other conditions that contributed to their death in addition to the virus.
这文章里面明明是说对6%的死者来说新冠病毒是唯一的死因,对其他94%的死者,新冠病毒不是唯一的死因,而是和其他疾病共同致死。那么这样说又有什么不对呢?新冠病毒不是唯一的死因,也仍然是死因之一啊,而你是怎么说的呢?
“94%在统计显示死于新冠的病人实际上死于并发症或基础病。”后来又说是“死时携带新冠病毒不能说病人死于新冠”,你贴的文章里是怎么说的?
keep in mind that death certificates could have COVID-19, pneumonia, and respiratory failure all as cause of death
死亡证明上死因可以不唯一,可以有多个死因。
所以说来说去,你这个文章里面明明白白说了,COVID-19就是死因(或之一)。既然这样,统计数字把这些人列入新冠病毒致死人数有何不对?好了,现在请问你贴这篇文章,是打算给自己当例证呢,还是你觉得别人看不懂英文? |
|